RunTheTests
/

Wi-Fi Scan Report Interpreter

Read a Wi-Fi report and understand signal, noise and channel choice.

What you paste

Parsed in your browser — never uploaded

How this reads your output

Signal, channel, band and link rates are read from the report. Windows reports signal as a percentage rather than in dBm, so it is converted using the roughly linear mapping between -100 and -50 dBm that drivers use to produce it in the first place. Where a noise figure is present, the signal-to-noise ratio is computed, which predicts throughput far better than signal strength alone.

What the results mean

Signal strength in dBm
A logarithmic scale where each 3 dB is half the power. Above -60 is good, -70 is usable, and below -80 is unusable regardless of what the router can do.
Signal to noise ratio
Signal above the noise floor. Below 15 dB, throughput collapses even with a strong signal, which is why a busy environment performs worse than a quiet one at the same strength.
Link rate
The negotiated rate, not achievable throughput. Real throughput is typically half of it at best, because airtime is shared and every transmission has overhead.

Common problems and fixes

Strong signal but slow speeds
Look at the channel and the noise floor. Wi-Fi is a shared medium, so a strong signal on a congested channel performs worse than a moderate signal on a quiet one. On 2.4 GHz, only channels 1, 6 and 11 avoid overlapping, and anything else interferes with two channels at once. Moving to 5 GHz solves it outright where the devices support it.
One device slows the whole network
This is airtime fairness, and it is inherent to how Wi-Fi works. A device on a weak signal transmits at a low rate, so it occupies the channel far longer to send the same data, and everyone else waits. Improving coverage for the worst device helps everyone more than upgrading the router does.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good Wi-Fi signal strength?

Better than -60 dBm is good, -67 dBm is the usual minimum for reliable video and voice, and below -75 dBm the connection becomes unreliable. Because the scale is logarithmic, the difference between -60 and -70 is a factor of ten in power rather than a small step.

Should I use 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz?

5 GHz wherever the signal reaches, since it has far more non-overlapping channels and much less interference from other equipment. 2.4 GHz travels further and through walls better, which makes it the right choice for distant devices and for anything that only supports it.

Does a better router fix a weak signal?

Rarely, because the link is symmetrical: a powerful router still has to hear a phone with a small antenna replying. Adding an access point closer to the problem area works far better than a stronger radio in the same place, and a wired connection to that access point matters more than the model.

Put this on your own site

Free to embed, no attribution required beyond the source link the frame carries itself. It runs entirely in your visitor's browser, sets no cookies and loads no third-party script.

Embed code
<iframe src="https://runthetests.com/embed/wifi-report-interpreter/" width="100%" height="720" style="border:1px solid #e5e5e5;border-radius:8px" title="Wi-Fi Scan Report Interpreter" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Preview it at https://runthetests.com/embed/wifi-report-interpreter/. Embedded pages are marked noindex, so yours stays the canonical copy — not this one.

More in Connection